×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Complaints and feedback News Contact
Scoping review

This is an early access version

Salivary uric acid in psychiatric disorders and acute psychosocial stress: a scoping review

By
Miodrag Kovačević Orcid logo ,
Miodrag Kovačević
Contact Miodrag Kovačević

Faculty of Medicine Foča, University of East Sarajevo , Lukavica , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Branka Kovačević ,
Branka Kovačević

Faculty of Medicine Foča, University of East Sarajevo , Lukavica , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Snežana Marjanović ,
Snežana Marjanović

Faculty of Medicine Foča, University of East Sarajevo , Lukavica , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Dragana Puhalo Sladoje ,
Dragana Puhalo Sladoje

Faculty of Medicine Foča, University of East Sarajevo , Lukavica , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Mile Jevtic
Mile Jevtic

Institute for Forensic psychiatry , Sokolac , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Editor: Adrijan Sarajlija

Abstract

Introduction. Salivary uric acid (UA) has been proposed as a non-invasive biomarker of oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in psychiatric disorders. This scoping review aimed to map evidence on salivary UA in psychiatric conditions and during acute psychosocial stress, identify methodologies, and highlight gaps. 
Methods. PubMed was searched (2014–2025) following JBI scoping review guidelines and PRISMA-ScR. Original human studies measuring salivary UA in psychiatric populations or stress paradigms were included. Data on study characteristics, saliva collection, and main findings were extracted. Risk-of-bias assessment 
was not performed.
Results. Seven studies (483 participants: psychiatric n=208, healthy stress-exposed n=275) met criteria. Evidence covered acute stress (n=3), dementia/Alzheimer’s (n=2), bipolar disorder (n=1), and eating disorders (n=1). Salivary UA was elevated during acute stress and in bipolar disorder, reduced in dementia, unchanged in Alzheimer’s, and elevated in eating disorders. Protocols and confounder control were heterogeneous. 
Conclusion. Evidence is limited and methodologically diverse. Preliminary findings are promising for stress reactivity and bipolar disorder, but insufficient for clinical application. Future research requires standardized protocols, longitudinal designs, and adjustment for confounders.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K. and B.K.; Investigation, M.K. and B.K.; Methodology, M.K. and B.K.; Writing – original draft, M.K. and B.K.; Writing – review & editing, M.K., B.K. and M.J.; Formal Analysis, B.K.; Visualization, B.K.; Supervision, S.M. and D.P.S.; Validation, S.M. and D.P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Citation

Funding Statement

None

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.