This is an early access version
Clinic of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina, University clinical center of Republika Srpska , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Clinic of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina, University clinical center of Republika Srpska , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Clinic of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina, University clinical center of Republika Srpska , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Clinic of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina, University clinical center of Republika Srpska , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Clinic of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina, University clinical center of Republika Srpska , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Introduction. Neuropathic pain (NP) is presented with a variety of symptoms, including “positive” (e.g., spontaneous pain, paresthesia, dysesthesia, allodynia, hyperalgesia, tingling, burning) and “negative” (e.g., numbness and loss of sensa
tion) features. The most common causes are diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and chronic low back pain syndrome
(CLBPS). This study aimed to determine the frequency and characteristics of NP in these conditions and to evaluate the
sensitivity of commonly used diagnostic questionnaires.
Methods. We examined 80 patients with DPN (40 with and 40 without NP) and 80 patients with CLBPS (40 with and 40
without NP). Assessments included electromyography (EMG), NIS-LL scoring for DPN, MRI of the lumbosacral spine for CLBPS and three NP questionnaires: Pain Detect Questionnaire (PDQ), Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS), and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4).
Results. In DPN, NP was associated with greater disease severity (higher NIS-LL scores), with allodynia being the most dis
tinguishing symptom. In CLBPS, key NP characteristics varied across the three questionnaires. Tingling was common in both conditions, regardless of NP status.
Conclusion. Allodynia is the defining feature of NP in DPN. NP questionnaires demonstrated lower diagnostic accuracy for
NP in CLBPS compared to DPN. DN4 demonstrated the highest sensitivity for NP detection.
Visualization, Z.V. and D.T.; Writing – original draft, Z.V.; Writing – review & editing, Z.V.; Conceptualization, A.D.K.; Investigation, A.D.K., S.G. and S.M.; Supervision, A.D.K.; Data curation, S.G.; Formal Analysis, S.G. and D.T.; Methodology, D.T.; Project administration, S.M.; Software, S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.