Introduction. Smoking prevalence among healthcare professionals is high in European countries and the surveys conducted in the past decade have confirmed the existence of this public health problem in the Republic of Srpska (RS) as well. The aim of this study is to investigate smoking habits, as well as the readiness for smoking cessation in family medicine services in RS. Methods. The study was conducted on randomly selected two-stage stratified sample in seven health centers in RS. Results. In family medicine services belonging to seven healthcare centers of RS, there were 22.7% of daily and 8% of occasional smokers. There were significantly higher percentage of smokers among nurses, compared to medical doctors. There were 10.5% of former smokers, mostly found among medical doctors. Approximately a quarter of smokers (25.3%) lit their first cigarette half an hour after waking up. The highest percent of health professionals (61.5%) intended to quit smoking, while more than a quarter (27.1%) were ready to quit smoking in the following 30 days, without any significant difference according to the healthcare professional profile. A small percentage of respondents used professional assistance (3.11%), as well as pharmacotherapeutic approach to the smoking cessation process (3.9%). Approximately one quarter of healthcare professionals (24.6%) were willing to participate in smoking cessation programs, but more than two-thirds of respondents needed additional motivation for it. Conclusion. This study has shown that more than a fifth of healthcare professionals in family medicine are daily smokers, and every one in ten individuals is a former smoker. Although half of healthcare professionals intend to quit smoking, it is a source of concern that the majority of respondents are reluctant to start the process of smoking cessation.
Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.